===========================Django 1.6.10 release notes===========================*January 13, 2015*Django 1.6.10 fixes several security issues in 1.6.9.WSGI header spoofing via underscore/dash conflation===================================================When HTTP headers are placed into the WSGI environ, they are normalized byconverting to uppercase, converting all dashes to underscores, and prepending``HTTP_``. For instance, a header ``X-Auth-User`` would become``HTTP_X_AUTH_USER`` in the WSGI environ (and thus also in Django's``request.META`` dictionary).Unfortunately, this means that the WSGI environ cannot distinguish betweenheaders containing dashes and headers containing underscores: ``X-Auth-User``and ``X-Auth_User`` both become ``HTTP_X_AUTH_USER``. This means that if aheader is used in a security-sensitive way (for instance, passingauthentication information along from a front-end proxy), even if the proxycarefully strips any incoming value for ``X-Auth-User``, an attacker may beable to provide an ``X-Auth_User`` header (with underscore) and bypass thisprotection.In order to prevent such attacks, both Nginx and Apache 2.4+ strip all headerscontaining underscores from incoming requests by default. Django's built-indevelopment server now does the same. Django's development server is notrecommended for production use, but matching the behavior of common productionservers reduces the surface area for behavior changes during deployment.Mitigated possible XSS attack via user-supplied redirect URLs=============================================================Django relies on user input in some cases (e.g.``django.contrib.auth.views.login()`` and :doc:`i18n </topics/i18n/index>`)to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security checks for theseredirects (namely ``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) didn't strip leadingwhitespace on the tested URL and as such considered URLs like``\njavascript:...`` safe. If a developer relied on ``is_safe_url()`` toprovide safe redirect targets and put such a URL into a link, they could sufferfrom a XSS attack. This bug doesn't affect Django currently, since we only putthis URL into the ``Location`` response header and browsers seem to ignoreJavaScript there.Denial-of-service attack against ``django.views.static.serve``==============================================================In older versions of Django, the :func:`django.views.static.serve` view readthe files it served one line at a time. Therefore, a big file with no newlineswould result in memory usage equal to the size of that file. An attacker couldexploit this and launch a denial-of-service attack by simultaneously requestingmany large files. This view now reads the file in chunks to prevent largememory usage.Note, however, that this view has always carried a warning that it is nothardened for production use and should be used only as a development aid. Nowmay be a good time to audit your project and serve your files in productionusing a real front-end web server if you are not doing so.Database denial-of-service with ``ModelMultipleChoiceField``============================================================Given a form that uses ``ModelMultipleChoiceField`` and``show_hidden_initial=True`` (not a documented API), it was possible for a userto cause an unreasonable number of SQL queries by submitting duplicate valuesfor the field's data. The validation logic in ``ModelMultipleChoiceField`` nowdeduplicates submitted values to address this issue.