1. ===========================
    
  2. Django 1.6.10 release notes
    
  3. ===========================
    
  4. 
    
  5. *January 13, 2015*
    
  6. 
    
  7. Django 1.6.10 fixes several security issues in 1.6.9.
    
  8. 
    
  9. WSGI header spoofing via underscore/dash conflation
    
  10. ===================================================
    
  11. 
    
  12. When HTTP headers are placed into the WSGI environ, they are normalized by
    
  13. converting to uppercase, converting all dashes to underscores, and prepending
    
  14. ``HTTP_``. For instance, a header ``X-Auth-User`` would become
    
  15. ``HTTP_X_AUTH_USER`` in the WSGI environ (and thus also in Django's
    
  16. ``request.META`` dictionary).
    
  17. 
    
  18. Unfortunately, this means that the WSGI environ cannot distinguish between
    
  19. headers containing dashes and headers containing underscores: ``X-Auth-User``
    
  20. and ``X-Auth_User`` both become ``HTTP_X_AUTH_USER``. This means that if a
    
  21. header is used in a security-sensitive way (for instance, passing
    
  22. authentication information along from a front-end proxy), even if the proxy
    
  23. carefully strips any incoming value for ``X-Auth-User``, an attacker may be
    
  24. able to provide an ``X-Auth_User`` header (with underscore) and bypass this
    
  25. protection.
    
  26. 
    
  27. In order to prevent such attacks, both Nginx and Apache 2.4+ strip all headers
    
  28. containing underscores from incoming requests by default. Django's built-in
    
  29. development server now does the same. Django's development server is not
    
  30. recommended for production use, but matching the behavior of common production
    
  31. servers reduces the surface area for behavior changes during deployment.
    
  32. 
    
  33. Mitigated possible XSS attack via user-supplied redirect URLs
    
  34. =============================================================
    
  35. 
    
  36. Django relies on user input in some cases (e.g.
    
  37. ``django.contrib.auth.views.login()`` and :doc:`i18n </topics/i18n/index>`)
    
  38. to redirect the user to an "on success" URL. The security checks for these
    
  39. redirects (namely ``django.utils.http.is_safe_url()``) didn't strip leading
    
  40. whitespace on the tested URL and as such considered URLs like
    
  41. ``\njavascript:...`` safe. If a developer relied on ``is_safe_url()`` to
    
  42. provide safe redirect targets and put such a URL into a link, they could suffer
    
  43. from a XSS attack. This bug doesn't affect Django currently, since we only put
    
  44. this URL into the ``Location`` response header and browsers seem to ignore
    
  45. JavaScript there.
    
  46. 
    
  47. Denial-of-service attack against ``django.views.static.serve``
    
  48. ==============================================================
    
  49. 
    
  50. In older versions of Django, the :func:`django.views.static.serve` view read
    
  51. the files it served one line at a time. Therefore, a big file with no newlines
    
  52. would result in memory usage equal to the size of that file. An attacker could
    
  53. exploit this and launch a denial-of-service attack by simultaneously requesting
    
  54. many large files. This view now reads the file in chunks to prevent large
    
  55. memory usage.
    
  56. 
    
  57. Note, however, that this view has always carried a warning that it is not
    
  58. hardened for production use and should be used only as a development aid. Now
    
  59. may be a good time to audit your project and serve your files in production
    
  60. using a real front-end web server if you are not doing so.
    
  61. 
    
  62. Database denial-of-service with ``ModelMultipleChoiceField``
    
  63. ============================================================
    
  64. 
    
  65. Given a form that uses ``ModelMultipleChoiceField`` and
    
  66. ``show_hidden_initial=True`` (not a documented API), it was possible for a user
    
  67. to cause an unreasonable number of SQL queries by submitting duplicate values
    
  68. for the field's data. The validation logic in ``ModelMultipleChoiceField`` now
    
  69. deduplicates submitted values to address this issue.