=================================How to create database migrations=================================This document explains how to structure and write database migrations fordifferent scenarios you might encounter. For introductory material onmigrations, see :doc:`the topic guide </topics/migrations>`... _data-migrations-and-multiple-databases:Data migrations and multiple databases======================================When using multiple databases, you may need to figure out whether or not torun a migration against a particular database. For example, you may want to**only** run a migration on a particular database.In order to do that you can check the database connection's alias inside a``RunPython`` operation by looking at the ``schema_editor.connection.alias``attribute::from django.db import migrationsdef forwards(apps, schema_editor):if schema_editor.connection.alias != 'default':return# Your migration code goes hereclass Migration(migrations.Migration):dependencies = [# Dependencies to other migrations]operations = [migrations.RunPython(forwards),]You can also provide hints that will be passed to the :meth:`allow_migrate()`method of database routers as ``**hints``:.. code-block:: python:caption: ``myapp/dbrouters.py``class MyRouter:def allow_migrate(self, db, app_label, model_name=None, **hints):if 'target_db' in hints:return db == hints['target_db']return TrueThen, to leverage this in your migrations, do the following::from django.db import migrationsdef forwards(apps, schema_editor):# Your migration code goes here...class Migration(migrations.Migration):dependencies = [# Dependencies to other migrations]operations = [migrations.RunPython(forwards, hints={'target_db': 'default'}),]If your ``RunPython`` or ``RunSQL`` operation only affects one model, it's goodpractice to pass ``model_name`` as a hint to make it as transparent as possibleto the router. This is especially important for reusable and third-party apps.Migrations that add unique fields=================================Applying a "plain" migration that adds a unique non-nullable field to a tablewith existing rows will raise an error because the value used to populateexisting rows is generated only once, thus breaking the unique constraint.Therefore, the following steps should be taken. In this example, we'll add anon-nullable :class:`~django.db.models.UUIDField` with a default value. Modifythe respective field according to your needs.* Add the field on your model with ``default=uuid.uuid4`` and ``unique=True``arguments (choose an appropriate default for the type of the field you'readding).* Run the :djadmin:`makemigrations` command. This should generate a migrationwith an ``AddField`` operation.* Generate two empty migration files for the same app by running``makemigrations myapp --empty`` twice. We've renamed the migration files togive them meaningful names in the examples below.* Copy the ``AddField`` operation from the auto-generated migration (the firstof the three new files) to the last migration, change ``AddField`` to``AlterField``, and add imports of ``uuid`` and ``models``. For example:.. code-block:: python:caption: ``0006_remove_uuid_null.py``# Generated by Django A.B on YYYY-MM-DD HH:MMfrom django.db import migrations, modelsimport uuidclass Migration(migrations.Migration):dependencies = [('myapp', '0005_populate_uuid_values'),]operations = [migrations.AlterField(model_name='mymodel',name='uuid',field=models.UUIDField(default=uuid.uuid4, unique=True),),]* Edit the first migration file. The generated migration class should looksimilar to this:.. code-block:: python:caption: ``0004_add_uuid_field.py``class Migration(migrations.Migration):dependencies = [('myapp', '0003_auto_20150129_1705'),]operations = [migrations.AddField(model_name='mymodel',name='uuid',field=models.UUIDField(default=uuid.uuid4, unique=True),),]Change ``unique=True`` to ``null=True`` -- this will create the intermediarynull field and defer creating the unique constraint until we've populatedunique values on all the rows.* In the first empty migration file, add a:class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.RunPython` or:class:`~django.db.migrations.operations.RunSQL` operation to generate aunique value (UUID in the example) for each existing row. Also add an importof ``uuid``. For example:.. code-block:: python:caption: ``0005_populate_uuid_values.py``# Generated by Django A.B on YYYY-MM-DD HH:MMfrom django.db import migrationsimport uuiddef gen_uuid(apps, schema_editor):MyModel = apps.get_model('myapp', 'MyModel')for row in MyModel.objects.all():row.uuid = uuid.uuid4()row.save(update_fields=['uuid'])class Migration(migrations.Migration):dependencies = [('myapp', '0004_add_uuid_field'),]operations = [# omit reverse_code=... if you don't want the migration to be reversible.migrations.RunPython(gen_uuid, reverse_code=migrations.RunPython.noop),]* Now you can apply the migrations as usual with the :djadmin:`migrate` command.Note there is a race condition if you allow objects to be created while thismigration is running. Objects created after the ``AddField`` and before``RunPython`` will have their original ``uuid``’s overwritten... _non-atomic-migrations:Non-atomic migrations~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~On databases that support DDL transactions (SQLite and PostgreSQL), migrationswill run inside a transaction by default. For use cases such as performing datamigrations on large tables, you may want to prevent a migration from running ina transaction by setting the ``atomic`` attribute to ``False``::from django.db import migrationsclass Migration(migrations.Migration):atomic = FalseWithin such a migration, all operations are run without a transaction. It'spossible to execute parts of the migration inside a transaction using:func:`~django.db.transaction.atomic()` or by passing ``atomic=True`` to``RunPython``.Here's an example of a non-atomic data migration that updates a large table insmaller batches::import uuidfrom django.db import migrations, transactiondef gen_uuid(apps, schema_editor):MyModel = apps.get_model('myapp', 'MyModel')while MyModel.objects.filter(uuid__isnull=True).exists():with transaction.atomic():for row in MyModel.objects.filter(uuid__isnull=True)[:1000]:row.uuid = uuid.uuid4()row.save()class Migration(migrations.Migration):atomic = Falseoperations = [migrations.RunPython(gen_uuid),]The ``atomic`` attribute doesn't have an effect on databases that don't supportDDL transactions (e.g. MySQL, Oracle). (MySQL's `atomic DDL statement support<https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/en/atomic-ddl.html>`_ refers to individualstatements rather than multiple statements wrapped in a transaction that can berolled back.)Controlling the order of migrations===================================Django determines the order in which migrations should be applied not by thefilename of each migration, but by building a graph using two properties on the``Migration`` class: ``dependencies`` and ``run_before``.If you've used the :djadmin:`makemigrations` command you've probablyalready seen ``dependencies`` in action because auto-createdmigrations have this defined as part of their creation process.The ``dependencies`` property is declared like this::from django.db import migrationsclass Migration(migrations.Migration):dependencies = [('myapp', '0123_the_previous_migration'),]Usually this will be enough, but from time to time you may need toensure that your migration runs *before* other migrations. This isuseful, for example, to make third-party apps' migrations run *after*your :setting:`AUTH_USER_MODEL` replacement.To achieve this, place all migrations that should depend on yours inthe ``run_before`` attribute on your ``Migration`` class::class Migration(migrations.Migration):...run_before = [('third_party_app', '0001_do_awesome'),]Prefer using ``dependencies`` over ``run_before`` when possible. You shouldonly use ``run_before`` if it is undesirable or impractical to specify``dependencies`` in the migration which you want to run after the one you arewriting.Migrating data between third-party apps=======================================You can use a data migration to move data from one third-party application toanother.If you plan to remove the old app later, you'll need to set the ``dependencies``property based on whether or not the old app is installed. Otherwise, you'llhave missing dependencies once you uninstall the old app. Similarly, you'llneed to catch :exc:`LookupError` in the ``apps.get_model()`` call thatretrieves models from the old app. This approach allows you to deploy yourproject anywhere without first installing and then uninstalling the old app.Here's a sample migration:.. code-block:: python:caption: ``myapp/migrations/0124_move_old_app_to_new_app.py``from django.apps import apps as global_appsfrom django.db import migrationsdef forwards(apps, schema_editor):try:OldModel = apps.get_model('old_app', 'OldModel')except LookupError:# The old app isn't installed.returnNewModel = apps.get_model('new_app', 'NewModel')NewModel.objects.bulk_create(NewModel(new_attribute=old_object.old_attribute)for old_object in OldModel.objects.all())class Migration(migrations.Migration):operations = [migrations.RunPython(forwards, migrations.RunPython.noop),]dependencies = [('myapp', '0123_the_previous_migration'),('new_app', '0001_initial'),]if global_apps.is_installed('old_app'):dependencies.append(('old_app', '0001_initial'))Also consider what you want to happen when the migration is unapplied. Youcould either do nothing (as in the example above) or remove some or all of thedata from the new application. Adjust the second argument of the:mod:`~django.db.migrations.operations.RunPython` operation accordingly... _changing-a-manytomanyfield-to-use-a-through-model:Changing a ``ManyToManyField`` to use a ``through`` model=========================================================If you change a :class:`~django.db.models.ManyToManyField` to use a ``through``model, the default migration will delete the existing table and create a newone, losing the existing relations. To avoid this, you can use:class:`.SeparateDatabaseAndState` to rename the existing table to the newtable name while telling the migration autodetector that the new model hasbeen created. You can check the existing table name through:djadmin:`sqlmigrate` or :djadmin:`dbshell`. You can check the new table namewith the through model's ``_meta.db_table`` property. Your new ``through``model should use the same names for the ``ForeignKey``\s as Django did. Also ifit needs any extra fields, they should be added in operations after:class:`.SeparateDatabaseAndState`.For example, if we had a ``Book`` model with a ``ManyToManyField`` linking to``Author``, we could add a through model ``AuthorBook`` with a new field``is_primary``, like so::from django.db import migrations, modelsimport django.db.models.deletionclass Migration(migrations.Migration):dependencies = [('core', '0001_initial'),]operations = [migrations.SeparateDatabaseAndState(database_operations=[# Old table name from checking with sqlmigrate, new table# name from AuthorBook._meta.db_table.migrations.RunSQL(sql='ALTER TABLE core_book_authors RENAME TO core_authorbook',reverse_sql='ALTER TABLE core_authorbook RENAME TO core_book_authors',),],state_operations=[migrations.CreateModel(name='AuthorBook',fields=[('id',models.AutoField(auto_created=True,primary_key=True,serialize=False,verbose_name='ID',),),('author',models.ForeignKey(on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.DO_NOTHING,to='core.Author',),),('book',models.ForeignKey(on_delete=django.db.models.deletion.DO_NOTHING,to='core.Book',),),],),migrations.AlterField(model_name='book',name='authors',field=models.ManyToManyField(to='core.Author',through='core.AuthorBook',),),],),migrations.AddField(model_name='authorbook',name='is_primary',field=models.BooleanField(default=False),),]Changing an unmanaged model to managed======================================If you want to change an unmanaged model (:attr:`managed=False<django.db.models.Options.managed>`) to managed, you must remove``managed=False`` and generate a migration before making other schema-relatedchanges to the model, since schema changes that appear in the migration thatcontains the operation to change ``Meta.managed`` may not be applied.